##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Since the 1960s, organizations in the public sector have used new technology to manage their workloads more effectively. The context in which citizens and public employees engage has altered because of digitized public services, changing the location of public meetings from a public official's office to a technological device. This paper aims to identify important aspects of public service digitization that changed our understanding of the interaction between citizens and government. It is a hermeneutic literature review that aims to expand our understanding of how the digitization of public services is developing in Albania. The authors try to explore the relationships between citizens, government agencies, and digital public services, which are those that are offered or mediated by the Internet. As a methodology, secondary data was used, i.e., a thorough review of the literature, including laws, decisions, official reports and documents, scientific articles and studies, books, etc. to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of public service digitalization in Albania. In conclusion, during the last 16 years (2005-2021), the use of information technology for the benefit of public service administration innovation has gained particular importance, supported by a framework of policies, plans, regulations, and new institutions. On the other hand, Albania has made notable progress in this area, offering 61% of public services online, through the e-Albania platform. The paper recommendations to improve the infrastructure for inclusiveness in access to services, giving importance not only to individuals with special needs but also to the development of rural areas.

References

  1. AKEP (2021). Authority of Electronic and Postal Communications, Annual Report 2020. Tirana.
     Google Scholar
  2. AKEP (2022). Authority of Electronic and Postal Communications, Annual Report 2021. Tirana. https://akep.al/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/AKEP-Raporti-Vjetor-2021.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  3. AkshWpUserAd. (n.d.). Karçanaj: Pandemia dëshmoi se investimet teknologjike në Shqipëri janë reale – Agjencia Kombëtare e Shoqërisë së Informacionit. Retrieved from: https://akshi.gov.al/karcanaj-pandemia-deshmoi-se-investimet-teknologjike-ne-shqiperi-jane-reale/.
     Google Scholar
  4. AKSHI (2020). Cross-Sectoral Strategy-Albania's Digital Agenda 2015-2020: Monitoring Report. Council of Ministers. December.
     Google Scholar
  5. Beqiri, E. E. (2005). Electronic Business. University of Pristina, FSHAB, Peja.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bucklin, R.E., & Sismeiro, C. (2009) Advances in Click-Stream Data Analysis in Marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.004.
     Google Scholar
  7. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2018). United Nations E-Government Survey 2018. New York. Retrieved from: publicadministration.un.org.
     Google Scholar
  8. Heeks, R. (1999). Information and Communication Technologies, Poverty and Development.
     Google Scholar
  9. ICTSmedia. (2020, October 30). Penetrimi i internetit në zonat rurale problem në Shqipëri - PCWorld Albanian. PCWorld Albanian. https://pcworld.al/penetrimi-i-internetit-ne-zonat-rurale-problem-ne-shqiperi/
     Google Scholar
  10. INSTAT. (2016). Information and Communication Technology in the Enterprise Report.
     Google Scholar
  11. Kumar, V., Aksoy, L., Donkers, B., Venkatesan, R., Wiesel, T., & Tillmanns, S. (2010). Undervalued or Overvalued Customers: Capturing Total Customer Engagement Value. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 297–310.
     Google Scholar
  12. Lee, E.A., & Seshia, S.A. (2011). Introduction to Embedded Systems - A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach. Available at: LeeSeshia.org.
     Google Scholar
  13. Lin, N., Wu, B., Jansen, R., Gerstein, M., & Zhao, H. (2004). Information assessment on predicting protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics, 5(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-154.
     Google Scholar
  14. Lindgren, I, Madsen, C., Hofmann, S., Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 427–436.
     Google Scholar
  15. Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.006.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Tourism and Environment (2019-2023). National Strategy for the Sustainable Development of Tourism. Tirana. https://turizmi.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Strategjia-Komb%C3%ABtare-e-Turizmit-2019-2023.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  17. Moe, W. W., & Fader, P. S. (2004). Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites. Management Science, 50(3), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0153.
     Google Scholar
  18. National Strategy for Sustainable Tourism Development (2019–2023). Ministry of Tourism and Environment. Republic of Albania.
     Google Scholar
  19. Newsroom. (2020). Albania presented with two important awards for digital government and e-learning. Kryeministria. Retrieved from: https://kryeministria.al/en/newsroom/shqiperia-vleresohet-me-dy-cmime-te-rendesishme-per-qeverisjen-digjitale-dhe-e-learning/.
     Google Scholar
  20. Ndou, V. (2004). E - Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x
     Google Scholar
  21. Official Gazette no. 284 (2005). On the creation of the Central Group for monitoring the implementation of the reform for the removal of administrative obstacles in the field of investments. Order of the CM no. 63.
     Google Scholar
  22. Official Gazette no. 66 (2006). On the ratification of the Strategic Objective Grant Agreement, between the Government of the Republic of Albania and the United States of America (USA), to fight corruption, within the framework of the initial assessment program of the Millennium Challenge (MCCP). Law no. 9549.
     Google Scholar
  23. Official Gazette no. 56 (2015). On the approval of the Intersectoral Strategy. Digital Agenda of Albania 2015-2020. VKM no. 284.
     Google Scholar
  24. Pieterson, W. J., Ebbers, W. E., & Madsen, C. M. (2017). New Channels, New Possibilities: A Typology and Classification of Social Robots and Their Role in Multi-channel Public Service Delivery. In Springer eBooks (pp. 47–59). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_5.
     Google Scholar
  25. Strategy for Electronic Government (2009-2015). Government of the Republic of Kosovo. Ministry of Public Services. Department of Information Technology.
     Google Scholar
  26. Schelin, S. H. (2011) E-Government: An Overview. In Modern Public Information Technology Systems: Issues and Challenges (pp. 110–126). IGI Global eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-051-6.ch006.
     Google Scholar
  27. United Nations Department of Economic & Social Affairs. (2022). E-Government Survey 2022-The future of the Digital Government. United Nations New York. 1-311. Retrieved from: https://publicadministration.un.org/en/.
     Google Scholar
  28. United Nations Economic & Social Affairs. (2018). UN E-Government Survey 2018. Gearing E-Government To Support Transformation Towards Sustainable And Resilient Societies. Retrieved from: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018.
     Google Scholar
  29. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.
     Google Scholar