University of Patras, Greece.
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

This research comes to measure the level of knowledge, understanding, skills, attitudes and values of educators on global competence. The quantitative methodology was followed and the questionnaire tool was selected. Random sampling technique was used, and the questionnaire was delivered through google forms. The sample consisted of 310 educators who taught in public and private Vocational Training Institutes in the region of Western Greece during 2021-2022. Research findings show that the average value for global knowledge is 3,69 (a lot), for understanding globalization 4,10 (a lot) and for international academic knowledge 3,91 (a lot). Regarding participants' answers for the Skills sub-factors, the average value for the use of tools is 4, 27 (a lot), for the cross-cultural communication 4,03 (a lot) and for the international academic knowledge 3,29 (enough). Regarding the factors of Attitude and values, the average value for intent to interact is 3, 95 (a lot), for open attitude 4,46 (a lot) and for the values 3,94 (a lot). In addition, the control of the Pearson correlation coefficient of the nine factors for global capability shows a statistically significant positive correlation between them. Finally, gender, additional studies, employment relationship and years of service seem to affect the results of the scale.

References

  1. Agnello, M.F., White, D.R., & Fryer, W. (2006). Toward Twenty-First Century Global Citizenship: A Teacher Education Curriculum. Social Studies Research and Practice, 1(3), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2006-B0003.
     Google Scholar
  2. Arvanitis, E., Bertozzis, R., & Armaos, R. (2019). Intercultural sensitivity in cross-cultural settings: The case of university students in Italy and Greece. In L. Daher (Ed.), Multi (Inter) cultural school in inclusive societies? An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 146-166). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  3. Babbie, E. (2011). Introduction to Social Research. Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
     Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, Ε.Ο., Higgins, H.J, & Hilburn, J. (2020). Using a global competence model in an instructional design course before social studies methods: A developmental approach to global teacher education. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.04.002
     Google Scholar
  5. Ford, Th., & Quinn, L. (2010). First Year Teacher Education Candidates: What Are Their Perceptions about Multicultural Education? Multicultural Education, 17(4), 18-24.
     Google Scholar
  6. Karanikola, Z., Katsiouli, G., & Palaiologou, N. (2022). Teachers’ Global Perceptions and Views, Practices and Needs in Multicultural Settings. Educational Sciences, 12, 280. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci12040280.
     Google Scholar
  7. Liu, Y., Yin, Y., & Wu, R. (2020). Measuring graduate students’ global competence: Instrument development and an empirical study with a Chinese sample. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67(2), 100915.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100915.
     Google Scholar
  8. Longview Foundation. (2008). Teacher preparation for the global age: The imperative for change. Silver Spring, MD: Longview Foundation.
     Google Scholar
  9. Merryfield, M.M., & Subedi, B. (2006). Decolonizing the mind for world-centred global education. In E. Ross, & W. Alba (Eds), The Social Studies Curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (pp. 283–295). State University of New York Press.
     Google Scholar
  10. Mmantsetsa, M.P., & Griffin, C.G. (2019). Future Competences and the Future of Curriculum. A Global Reference for Curricula Transformation. UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE). http://www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/future_competences_and_the_future_of_curriculum.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1Y3Ac0dNgpHqle02-OwYQ-b-eAZfwEHJ3PwnbUZa8TXIa-PZQpTrMjnhU.
     Google Scholar
  11. O'Connor, K., & Zeichner, K. (2011). Preparing US teachers for critical global education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3-4), 521-536.
     Google Scholar
  12. OECD. (2016). Global competency for an inclusive world. https://www.oecd.org/education/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2018). Teaching for global competence in a rapidly changing world. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/teaching-for-global-competence-in-a-rapidly-changing-world_9789264289024-en.
     Google Scholar
  14. Panagiotopoulos, G., Pertesi, K., & Karanikola, Z. (2018). Adult Education and International Organizations (UNESCO): Contemporary Policies and Strategies. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8 (3), 126-139.
     Google Scholar
  15. Popov, V., Brinkman, D., & Van Oudenhoven, J.P. (2017). Becoming globally competent through student mobility. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education: Bridging the Worlds of Work and Education (pp. 1007-1028). New York: Springer.
     Google Scholar
  16. Pylvas, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). Intercultural competence: Toward Global Understanding. In S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, & R. Suart (Eds), Handbook of Vocational Education and Training (pp. 1283–1295). New York: Springer.
     Google Scholar
  17. United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Human Development Report 2015: Work for Human Development. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report.pdf.
     Google Scholar