Catholic University of Eastern Africa (Tangaza University College), Kenya.
* Corresponding author
Tangaza University College, Kenya.

Article Main Content

Ecosystem degradation in and around refugees’ settlements caused a dire problem for the livelihood of refugees. Therefore this study sought to examine the perceived relationship between ecosystem sustainability and refugees’ livelihood in Kalobeyei integrated settlement. The study used a mixed method and descriptive survey research design. The study employed Cochran's (1977) sample size computation for ordered categorical data at a 95 % confidence level and an acceptable error margin of ± 4.2 %, generating an expected sample size of 137. Quantitative data were collected using a questionnaire from among 80 participants, and qualitative data was collected by means of focus group discussions involving 48 respondents. Interviews were held among 9 key informants. Thus, the total sample size was 137. The results showed that respondents perceived a high impact of the ecosystem on their livelihood as such, there is an imbalance between utilization and conservation of the ecosystem. The respondents of the study are very optimistic that harmonization of ecosystem sustainability and refugees’ livelihood is possible in the Kalobeyei settlement. The study advocates for the use of sustained supervision of the dryland forests by applying quantifiable measures that monitor resource utilization and conservation and the implementation of the Kenyan refugee bill act 2019 passed in 2021. This advocacy for the sustainability of the ecosystem in order to improve the livelihood in Kalobeyei integrated settlement.

References

  1. Abdeen. (2010). Africa the driest continent. New York: Novinka.
     Google Scholar
  2. Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community‐based conservation. Conservation biology, 18(3), 621-630.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bonkoungou, E. G. (2001). Biodiversity in drylands: challenges and opportunities for conservation and sustainable use. Challenge Paper. The Global Drylands Initiative, UNDP Drylands Development Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  4. Creswell, J. (2013). qualitative Inquiry & Reseach Design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
     Google Scholar
  5. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
     Google Scholar
  6. DePoy, E. A. (2013). Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies. London: Elsevier Health Sciences.
     Google Scholar
  7. Dudovskiy, J. (2021, March 18). Business Research Methodology. Retrieved from https://research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/snowball-sampling/
     Google Scholar
  8. Engineering & Environmental Services section. (2001, January 01). UNHCR: The UN Refugee Agency. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org.
     Google Scholar
  9. Khavetsa, C., & Karimi, M. (2020, October 2). medium.com/world-food-programme. Retrieved september 26, 2021, from medium.com/world-food-programme: https://medium.com/world-food-programme-insigh.
     Google Scholar
  10. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
     Google Scholar
  11. Martin, S. F., Howard, D. A., Smith, L., Yossinger, N. S., Kinne, L., & Giordano, M. (2017). Environmental Resource Management in Refugee Camps and Surrounding Areas: Lessons Learned and Best Practices, Report for the US Department of State, Bureau for Population, Refugees and Migration.
     Google Scholar
  12. Matti, P. & Erkki, L. (2003). AFRICAN DEFORESTATION: CAUSES AND SCENARIOS. Quebec City: the XII World Forestry Congress. Retrieved from fao.org: http://www.fao.org.
     Google Scholar
  13. McGrath, M. (2019). Deforestation: Tropical tree losses persist at high levels. BBC News. Retrieved 10 21, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com.
     Google Scholar
  14. Miller, S. (2018). Assessing the Impacts of hosting refugees. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
     Google Scholar
  15. Morgan, S. (2011, August 15). National Geographic. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
     Google Scholar
  16. Shepherd, G. (1995, September). The Impact of Refugees on the Environment and Appropriate Responses. HPN. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from https://odihpn.org.
     Google Scholar
  17. Swanson, R. (2013). theory building in applied disciplines. San Franscisco: C.A: Berret-Koehler Publisher.
     Google Scholar
  18. Tureti, M. (2016). Impact of refugees on host communities: the case of Kakuma Refugee Camp, northwestern Kenya, 1992-2002. HAL: archives-ouvertes. Retrieved from https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01302775.
     Google Scholar
  19. UNHCR & WOLD BANK GROUP. (2020). Kalobeyei_Socioeconomic-Report. UNHCR & WOLD BANK GROUP.
     Google Scholar
  20. UNHCR. (2019). handbook and guidelines on procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 convention and the 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees. UNHCR.
     Google Scholar
  21. UNV. (2021, january 15). unv+jobs+Nairobi. Retrieved from https://www.unvjobsNairobi: https://www.unvjobsNairobi
     Google Scholar
  22. Wei, F., Wang, S., Fu, B., Zhang, L., Fu, C., & Kanga, E. M. (2018). Balancing community livelihoods and biodiversity conservation of protected areas in East Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 33, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.013.
     Google Scholar
  23. WWF. (2019). deforestation-and-forest-degradation. Retrieved 10 21, 2019, from www.worldwildlife.org: https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/deforestation-and-forest-degradation
     Google Scholar
  24. Yasin, A. (2011). effects of refugees on the natural environment a case study of dadaab refugees camp, garissa district. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
     Google Scholar